Onward Holdings Co Ltd (8016)
In order to highlight any biases, we clearly attribute the views. A view of the company management will always be presented as such. Our views are ours where stated. We do not try to convince or influence, only to inform.
Your suggestions and feedback are appreciated. Write to us at sr_inquiries@sharedresearch.jp or find us on Bloomberg.As of February 5, 2012
|
|
This document is provided for informational purposes only. No investment opinion or advice is provided, intended, or solicited. Shared Research, Inc. offers no warranty, either expressed or implied, regarding the veracity of data or interpretations of data included in this report. Shared Research, Inc. shall not be held responsible for any damage caused by the use of this report.
The copyright of this report and the rights regarding the creation and exploitation of the derivative work of this and other Shared Research Reports belong to Shared Research, Inc. This report may be reproduced or modified for personal use; distribution, transfer, or other uses of this report are strictly prohibited and a violation of the copyright of this report.
Japanese Financial Instruments and Exchange Law (FIEL) Disclaimer
The initial version of this report has been prepared by Shared Research Inc. ("SR") under a contract with the company described in this report. Opinions and views presented are SR’s where so stated. Such opinions and views attributed to the company are interpretations made by SR. SR represents that if this report is deemed to include an opinion by SR that could influence investment decisions in the company described in this report, such opinion may be in exchange for consideration or promise of consideration from the company to SR.
Recent Updates
Highlights
On February 3, 2012, Onward released monthly sales data for January:click hereto go direct to the Monthly Trends section.
On January 11, 2012, the company released monthly sales data for December.
Note: due to issues with the venue for the company’s “family sale” events for 2011 there was an impact on November and December 2011 sales. Usually, the company holds two such sales in November and December, however, in 2011 only one event was held in November. Adjusting for a lack of a family sale in December, underlying sales were up 4.0% YoY. (Headline November 2011 sales were up 5.0% YoY due to the family sale effect, stripping this out November sales were effectively flat YoY.)
On January 6, 2012, the company released Q3 FY02/12 results: click here to go direct to the Q3 FY02/12 results section.
(For original PDF announcement in Japanese-language only, please click here.)
At the same time the company also released November monthly sales data.
For corporate releases and developments more than three months old please refer to the News & Topics section.
Trends & Outlook
Monthly Trends
Quarterly Trends
Comment on seasonality
The company’s quarterly sales and profits fluctuate significantly due to the timing of seasonal bargain sales. Q2 includes the summer sales period of July, and the proportion of merchandise sold at normal prices is low in August as bargain sales continue while stores convert to new fall lineups. As a result, profitability is likely to be severely impacted - Q2 operating profit was negative in both FY02/09 and FY02/10. In a similar manner, Q4 profit is affected by the winter bargain sale in January and by the revaluation loss recorded at fiscal year-end.
Q3 FY02/12 Results (Announced on January 6, 2012; please refer to the preceding tables)
The company maintained its full-year forecast.
Despite a recovery in consumption following March 2011’s earthquake in Tohoku, bad weather over the period resulted in a 0.3% YoY decline for cumulative Q3 FY02/12 sales, which came in at 182.5 billion yen. Gross profit margin though improved to 49.1% from 48.5% YoY on the back of a review of royalties of overseas licensed apparel brands and a strengthening of the product offering and store sales. The SG&A-to-sales ratio declined 2.3% YoY due to expense controls, which further raised profitability. Consequently, there was a 30.7% YoY increase in operating profit to 11.4 billion yen.
The company booked 1.0 billion yen in extraordinary profit for the period due to sales of fixed assets, however it also posted a 2.9 billion yen extraordinary loss stemming primarily from asset retirement obligation accounting provisions (1.1 billion yen) and the rebuilding/renovation of company headquarters (1.3 billion yen). Net income thus declined 7.0% YoY to 4.4 billion yen.
The company was planning to rebuild its headquarters in Nihonbashi in central Tokyo and book an extraordinary loss related to this in FY02/12 (the actual rebuild was to occur over a period of three-financial years). After the rebuild, the company will use part of the building for its own operations and plans to attract non-group tenants for the remaining space.
It should be noted Q3 sales at the core Onward Kashiyama unit were positively affected by the company bringing forward a “family sale” event into the Q3 period (see later in this section for further details). However, even when factoring in special occurrences such as this, the company remarked its Q3 FY02/12 cumulative results still came in ahead of forecast.
In addition, Onward Kashiyama’s January New Year sales campaign generated solid sales. Against the backdrop of its recent strong performance, SR Inc.’s perception is that among the Fall and Winter season products that the company is launching, it is achieving solid sales of coats and other outer wear aided by favorable weather (such as a drop in temperature since mid-December). Up to end-2011, menswear had sold well while womenswear had been in a slump, however, sales of the latter were staging a recovery.
The main subsidiaries’ cumulative Q3 performance follows below. Consolidated operating profit was up by 2.7 billion yen for the period YoY and breaking this down at the subsidiary level:
- Operating profit at Onward Trading fell by 180 million yen YoY and by 135 million yen at Onward Resort Group.
- Operating profit rose by 2.1 billion yen YoY at Onward Holdings and Onward Kashiyama, 494 million yen at GIBO’CO and 216 million yen at Across Transport.
- Onward Holdings and Onward Kashiyama
Sales of 113.2 billion yen (down 2.8% YoY); operating profit of 9.7 billion yen (up 28.0% YoY)
- Onward Trading
Sales of 11.0 billion yen (down 2.4% YoY); operating profit of 555 million yen (down 24.5% YoY)
- Chacotte
Sales of 7.8 billion yen (down 0.9% YoY); operating profit of 678 million yen (up 13.4% YoY)
- Island
Sales of 6.1 billion yen (up 14.3% YoY); operating profit of 1.1 billion yen (down 1.1% YoY)
- Creative Yoko
Sales of 5.2 billion yen (down 3.9% YoY); operating profit of 295 million yen (up 7.7% YoY)
- Onward Resort Group
Sales of 2.4 billion yen (down 12.8% YoY); operating loss of 37 million yen (vs. an operating loss of 98 million yen YoY)
- JOSEPH
Sales of 6.2 billion yen (down 2.5% YoY); operating loss of 584 million yen (vs. an operating loss of 576 million yen YoY)
- GIBO’CO
Sales of 11.9 billion yen (up 26.5% YoY); operating profit of 1.1 billion yen (vs. an operating profit of 593 million yen YoY)
- Jil Sander
Sales of 7.6 billion yen (up 11.0% YoY); operating loss of 415 million yen (vs. an operating loss of 342 million yen YoY)
Domestic
Onward Kashiyama registered a significant rise in profitability, led by its core brands, it absorbed the impact from the March 2011 earthquake in Tohoku by bolstering its product offerings and store sales, which led to improved profits.
Cumulative Q3 sales at core brands were as follows: Nijyusanku rose 0.3% YoY; +11.3% for Kumikyoku; +0.8% for Jiyuku, and +0.3% YoY for ICB. (On a quarterly basis Q3 core brand sales were: +5.1% YoY for Nijyusanku; +6.7% for Kumikyoku; +9.0% for Jiyuku, and +6.1% YoY for ICB.
Onward Kashiyama’s Q3 sales were boosted by around 2% due to the company not holding a “family sale” event in Tokyo in December but instead in Q3, thus bringing forward some sales into this period. Q3 sales of 44.8 billion yen at Onward Kashiyama and Onward Holdings were up 2.5% YoY (or 1.1 billion yen), operating profit meanwhile came in at 7.9 billion yen, a 29.3% YoY rise (or 1.8 billion yen higher). However, even when the afore-mentioned special factors are stripped out, sales still exceeded the company’s expectations. Moreover, cost controls are proving effective and Onward Kashiyama’s performance has also come in ahead of the initial forecast.
Domestically, Island continued to perform well and exceed forecasts, while Chacotte also generated solid results. In contrast, while Onward Trading has shown signs of a recovery in 2H, this has not been sufficient to make up for the slump it experienced in 1H and it failed to hit its forecasts. The company’s other subsidiaries performed approximately in-line with expectations.
Overseas
Operations in Europe recorded a significant improvement in financial results, while the company’s operations in Asia and North America continued to hold up well.
Generally speaking, the company’s European operations outperformed forecasts. Performance at JOSEPH came in below forecasts as the business was unable to recover from its 1H weak performance, however, results at JIL SANDER were in line with expectations. Both sales and profits came in better than anticipated at GIBO’CO, where performance was driven by wholesale revenues from new licensees.
Sales in Asia up to Q3 were strong. As of Q4, sales in China had fallen YoY and while this situation needs monitoring, sales in South Korea and Hong Kong were steady and region-wide Onward was experiencing no real problems.
Q2/1H FY02/12 Results (Announced on October 7, 2011; please refer to the tables above.)
1H (cumulative Q1-Q2) FY02/12 sales declined 2.3% YoY to 113.7 billion yen as consumers pulled back on consumption in the wake of March 2011’s earthquake in Tohoku. Gross profit margin though improved 0.3% (to 47.1% from 46.8% in the same period of FY02/11) thanks to downwardly reviewed royalties on selected licensed apparel brands and other factors.
SG&A expense controls further helped profitability leading to a 1.9% YoY increase in operating profit to 1.6 billion yen. Net income though declined 93.4% YoY to 76 million yen due to 1.3 billion yen in extraordinary losses (versus 202 million yen of extraordinary losses in 1H FY02/11). The bulk of extraordinary losses came from 1.1 billion yen of asset retirement obligation accounting provisions.
Sales, operating and recurring profits were all better than the company’s original forecast of 112.4 billion yen (actual results 1.2% above forecast); 1.4 billion yen (actual results 14.2% above forecast), and 2.2 billion yen (actual results 12.4% above forecast), respectively. Net income also came in stronger than the originally forecast 500 million yen net loss, as the company sold some land and realized an extraordinary gain of just under 1.1 billion yen.
The main subsidiaries’ 1H performance was as follows:
Domestic
Onward Holdings and Onward Kashiyama
Sales of 68.5 billion yen (down 6.1% YoY); operating profit of 1.8 billion yen (up 22.3% YoY)
(Note: while Onward Holdings does not generate any sales its costs are grouped with Onward Kashiyama’s).
Operating profit beat the original forecast owing to better gross profit margins (lower royalty payments and higher percentage of items sold at full prices) and lower SG&A expenses. Sales of core brands though were in negative territory, declining 3.0% YoY for Nijyusanku; 14.0% for Kumikyoku; 3.0% for Jiyuku, and 4% YoY for ICB.
Onward Trading
Sales of 7.4 billion yen (down 2.2% YoY); operating profit of 380 million yen (down 38.4% YoY)
Profitability declined as orders for both school and work uniforms fell due to March 2011's Tohoku earthquake and increased production costs in China.
Island
Sales of 3.9 billion yen (up 12.2% YoY); operating profit of 686 million yen (down 4.5% YoY)
Due to YoY base effects from 1H FY02/11 sales (of men's brands that are no longer carried) profits were down YoY, but sales exceeded the company forecast due to growth in sales at existing stores and new store openings.
Chacotte
Sales of 5.1 billion yen (down 1.0% YoY); operating profit of 409 million yen (up 3.3% YoY)
Led by the flagship store, since April a recovery in sales has accelerated and operating profit exceeded the company plan.
Creative Yoko
Sales of 3.4 billion yen (down 4.0% YoY); operating profit of 99 million yen (down 8.3% YoY)
Sales fell short of the company forecast due to the effects of March 2011's earthquake, but the gross profit margin met company expectations due to solid sales of full price items.
Overseas
GIBO’CO
Sales of 7.2 billion yen (up 25.9% YoY); operating profit of 340 million yen (vs. an operating loss of 31 million yen in 1H FY02/11)
Both sales and profits came in better than expected, driven by revenues from new licensees and improved factory utilization helped by the order flow from Onward group companies, such as Jil Sander.
Jil Sander
Sales of 4.9 billion yen (up 13.6% YoY); operating loss of 669 million yen (vs. an operating loss of 562 million yen in 1H FY02/11)
At Jil Sander, gross profit margins improved further thanks to it concentrating its manufacturing at GIBO’CO (as opposed to third party manufacturers). At the same time, expanding retail sales of Jil Sander Navy remained an issue.
JOSEPH
Sales of 4.2 billion yen (up 1.0% YoY); operating loss of 533 million yen (vs. an operating loss of 461 million yen in 1H FY02/11)
Gross profitability improved as the ratio of full-price (non-discounted) items in the sales mix increased. However, poor performance during the key winter-holidays sale period hurt performance, bringing sales in below expectations.
The company left its full year FY02/12 forecast unchanged, citing the uncertain environment.
Sales of the company’s core domestic unit, Onward Kashiyama, suggest sluggish Q2 performance due to the company’s decision to run its seasonal sale as ususal in July. At the same time a number of competitors started cutting prices earlier, driving consumers towards bargains and away from fully-priced items offerd by Kashiyama. SR Inc. understands the underwhelming performance trend started reversing itself in September and into October.
The following is a selection of comments made by Akinori Baba, the new President and CEO of Onward Kashiyama, at the 1H FY02/12 results meeting held on October 11, 2011.
- Under the current harsh business conditions, growth is not possible without higher sales. The company will look to make reforms in its organizational, manufacturing and creative capabilities and leverage these to propel growth in the new three year mid-term that begins from FY02/13.
- As far as growth goes there is room to expand domestically, as well as overseas. Department stores have been the company's main distribution channel and the company will continue to strengthen its operations there, as well as moving to bolster its other sales channels.
- The company's main products occupy the mass-market segment and have respectable and safe name recognition there. However, there is a sense that the company over the past several years has also failed to create a brand that inspires a sense of fashion. The company owns the Japanese trademark rights for “Opening Ceremony”, an overseas boutique store operator well known in the fashion industry. By using the Opening Ceremony brand we can send a message about how committed our company is to fashion.
- Jil Sander Navy has been rolled out overseas as an extension apparel line. On visiting Europe in September and discussing with the regional manager, we agreed Jil Sander Navy needs to be pushed harder as a diffusion line.
- Regarding JOSEPH, the company is aware that European consumers cut back on spending starting in September. However, in addition to Europe, Onward also has overseas operations in North America and Asia and increasing sales in North America and Asia is an urgent task for JOSEPH.
- J.PRESS is currently the company's main brand in North America but there are plans to begin sales of ICB in fall 2012. A design and planning team based in New York has been set up. The company would like to use ICB as a test-bed for exporting a brand to North America and then “importing” it back into Japan. The idea of exporting a brand to North America, and the depending on the circumstances, importing aspects back to Japan is something that could also apply to Asia. Japan and Europe are not the only geographies with the ability to create apparel. The company wants to create a system in which information and products from across its four geographies of operation can flow freely.
Q1 FY02/12 Results
On July 8, 2011, the company announced Q1 FY02/12 results (see table above).
Sales were down 4.8% YoY at 61.4 billion yen affected by poor consumer confidence and self-restraint due to March 2011’s Tohoku earthquake. Nonetheless, the company’s gross profit margin improved to 49.6% from 48.9% YoY, lifted by cost controls and its overseas business plan proceeding on track (primarily driven by reviewing overseas brand licensing royalties and inventory controls).
Operating profit was up 4.0% YoY at 4.7 billion yen. Net income, however, fell 16.7% YoY to 2.2 billion yen due to the booking of a 1.1 billion yen extraordinary loss from the implementation of accounting standards related to Asset Retirement Obligations (the total extraordinary loss for the period was 1.2 billion yen vs. 156 million yen a year earlier).
According to the company, these results came in better than planned due to two factors: April-May sales at Onward Kashiyama beat forecasts, and on a consolidated-basis cost-cutting was more effective than expected. The company had assumed April-May sales at Onward Kashiyama would be down 6.0% YoY, instead they came in 0.4% higher. Finally, SG&A expenses decreased 4.7% YoY primarily focused on labor and advertising costs at the consolidated level.
The company left its 1H and FY02/12 forecast unchanged. June sales at Onward Kashiyama were weak; down 4.0% YoY, and it appears the company was being cautious over Q2 FY02/12 results. Some competitors conducted summer sales ahead of schedule, while the company held sales at the beginning of July as usual, but it appears these were affected by weak consumer confidence.
Performance at the company’s main subsidiaries was as follows:
- Onward Holdings and Onward Kashiyama: 37.0 billion yen in sales (down 7.6% YoY), operating profit 3.8 billion yen (up 3.3% YoY)
- Onward Trading: 4.3 billion yen in sales (up 1.3% YoY), operating profit 312 million yen (down 20.6% YoY).
- Island: 1.9 billion yen in sales (up 7.9% YoY), operating profit of 318 million yen (down 16.1% YoY)
- Across Transport: sales 2.9 billion yen (up 5.4% YoY), operating profit 205 million yen (up 26.5% YoY).
- JOSEPH: sales of 2.4 billion yen (down 7.6% YoY), operating loss of 322 million yen (vs. previous year operating loss of 363 million yen)
- GIBO'CO: sales of 3.9 billion yen (up 7.6% YoY), operating income of 308 million yen (up 15.4%)
- JIL SANDER: sales of 2.8 billion yen (up 5.5% YoY), operating income of 42 million yen (vs. previous year operating loss of 49 million yen)
Domestic
- Onward Kashiyama: As mentioned above, results came in above company expectations. Total sales of core brands in Q1 FY02/12 did, however, fall 7.6%. By brand, Nijyusanku sales were down 4.6% YoY; Kumikyoku sales declined 15.6% YoY; ICB sales fell 4.4% YoY and Jiyuku sales were down 7.1% YoY. However, if one stripped out March’s performance due to the Tohoku earthquake, sales for April and May actually rose 1.1% for the core brands with Nijyusanku sales increasing 4.0% YoY for these two months; Kumikyoku sales gained 5.8% YoY; ICB sales rose 2.9% YoY and Jiyuku sales were up 1.3% YoY.
- Onward Trading: profitability declined as orders for both school and work uniforms fell due to March 2011’s Tohoku earthquake and production costs in China increased.
- Island: profit declined YoY due to base effects with sales conducted in Q1 FY02/11 year, although the company commented figures came in line with forecasts.
- Across Transport: profitability increased with the acquisition of new contracts.
Overseas
- JOSEPH: year-end and new-year bargain sales were weak and results came in below expectations. However, the company said it did not believe the situation was serious given strong sales for full-price items.
- GIBO'CO: results came in above forecast driven by new license agreements and increasing production rates for group enterprises, such as Jil Sander.
- Jil Sander: results came in above forecast.
For details on previous quarterly and annual results please refer to the Historical Financial Statements section.
Full Year (FY02/12) Outlook
Impact from March 11 Tohoku Earthquake.
About 40% of Onward Kashiyama’s department store and new distribution channels segment - as measured by sales - were affected by store closures or shortened operating hours in the aftermath of the earthquake. Consequently, March sales were down 22% YoY with the Kanto region off 35% YoY and the Tohoku region off 56%.
However, sales in late March began to stage a recovery and by the first week of April were up 3% YoY nationwide, with the Kanto region registering a 4% increase and Tohoku down 31% YoY.
Post-quake the company downgraded its FY02/12 sales forecast by 8.7 billion yen (Onward Kashiyama downwardly revised by 7.6 billion yen, and domestic subsidiaries and others the remaining 1.1 billion yen). Its gross profit forecast was cut by 4.4 billion yen and operating profit forecast by 1.5 billion.
The company assumptions for the sales impact and gross profit margins at a regional –level are outlined below. It believes some of the effects can be offset by cost-cutting efforts.
Kanto Area: Rolling blackouts to impact Q1 FY02/12 sales
Tohoku Area: Re-opening of closed stores and Fukushima nuclear issue to continue affecting sales over whole FY02/12
Other Regions: no impact seen since April 2011.
Overview of 2H FY02/12 Company Plan
The company is expecting sales to grow both domestically and overseas, and higher gross profit margins to raise profitability in 2H FY02/12.
At its domestic operations, sales are projected to rise 0.9% YoY to 82.1 billion yen at its core Onward Kashiyama business. The company itself appears to be confident that it can achieve its 2H forecast when cost controls and other measures are factored in.
On the other hand, the overseas operations’ retail business may be affected by the deteriorating economic climate in Europe. The company, however, remarked its wholesale business accounted for around 60.0% of its European operations, and it expected wholesale to remain comparatively stable.
Domestic
The company is forecasting Japanese sales to increase by 2.2% YoY to 138.8 billion yen, while operating profit is projected to increase 24.9% to 10.5 billion yen.
Breaking this down at the segment-level, Onward Kashiyama sales are projected to increase 0.9% YoY to 82.1 billion yen and generate an operating profit of 7.0 billion yen, up 18.0% YoY. Sales at domestic subsidiaries other than Onward Kashiyama are expected to come in 3.4% higher YoY at 33.3 billion yen and register operating profits of 2.1 billion yen, a 16.1% YoY increase.
Onward Kashiyama
Key measures cited for 2H were:
- Increase sales of full-price items and launch new strategic items as part of its cross-brand plan for the fall-winter sales season.
- 127 stores to be either opened or renovated, and 47 stores slated for closure. (As part of the 2H Rainbow Strategy, the new store openings and renovations also include nine mixed-use, large-format J.Press stores.)
- Launch of a new casual J.Press men's line, called RED LABEL, and opening of mixed-use, large-format stores.
- Opening of two new SOUTHERN WINDFEELS brand, large-format stores in urban shopping centers.
The company made the following comments regarding its other domestic subsidiaries:
- Onward Trading: Recovery in uniform orders remained a challenge but improvements in production costs should lead to improved profitability.
- Chacotte: increased profits were expected driven by strengthening of both directly managed stores and the wholesale business, and the impact from ongoing cost controls.
- Creative Yoko: plans for higher sales driven by new store openings in train station buildings and differentiated merchandising.
- Bus Stop: grow sales on the back of the newly renovated Daikanyama flagship store.
- Island: boost sales at standalone stores by leveraging the roll-out of large-format, mixed-use stores.
Overseas
The company is targeting sales to grow 18.6% YoY to 49.2 billion yen and the overseas business to swing to an operating profit of 936 million yen (vs. an operating loss of 99 million yen in FY02/11). Europe is expected to see good traction in operating profitability. The company also made the following statements on the outlook for its overseas subsidiaries:
- Jil Sander: increase sales by expanding the collection line and sales of Jil Sander Navy. Further improve the gross profit margin, and a return to profitability is expected in 2H.
- JOSEPH: expansion of retail sales centered on the flagship store, in addition to a push to strengthen wholesaling.
- GIBO'CO: forecast sales and profit growth of at least 10.0% YoY due to increased orders from group companies such as Jil Sander.
Future Outlook
The company had previously stated a sales goal of 350 billion yen, with 30 billion yen operating profit and 35 billion yen of recurring profit by 02/11. While the targets were not achieved, the company maintains that they are eventually achievable. Onward is currently taking more of a “first things first” approach and focusing on near-term execution rather than attaching specific dates to specific targets. Currently, it is more practical, comments the company, to look at an operating profit target of 15 billion yen, even if sales increase to 250 billion yen or so. The previous 350/30/35 plan seems to be out of reach without further M&A (which is not ruled out).
In spring 2012, the company plans to announce its new Medium-Term Three-Year Plan, which will start from FY02/13. As of January 2012, the details of the plan were unknown, with regard to the direction it intends to take, the company has commented that from FY02/13 onward its goal will be to accelerate growth rates (for both sales and operating profit).
Business
Business Description
The company’s core business is manufacturing and sales of fashion apparel. It derives the bulk (about 85% FY02/11) of revenues from Japan but has a growing worldwide presence, particularly in Europe. The company has started to emphasize overseas operations (FY02/10), but they are not yet significant (roughly 15% of FY02/11 sales). The main channel in Japan is department stores (77.1% of FY02/11 domestic sales of Onward Kashiyama) where it sells most of its fashion brands for men and women (with smaller lines for kids and fashion accessories thrown in the mix). The company defines itself as a high-end apparel manufacturer.
The company reports results across two segments: Apparel and Other. The Apparel segment is the most important for Onward, generating 93.9% of consolidated sales and over 100% of OP in FY02/11.
The company is organized as a holding structure – Onward Holdings Co., Ltd. is the reporting entity that controls about 100 subsidiaries (FY02/11). By far the most important is Onward Kashiyama Co., Ltd., responsible for apparel sales in Japan. See Group Structure for more.
Main Segments
Apparel (93.9% of sales, 9.0 billion yen operating profit in FY02/11)
Womenswear has historically been the larger contributor to domestic sales in the Apparel segment (approximately 68.0% of FY02/11 sales); menswear has typically been less (23.9%)
Womenswear
Womenswear focuses on upscale brand and fashion clothing. The target market in womenswear is working women in their 20s and to 40s. At the same time, SR Inc. wonders if some of brands started in 1990s targeting this demographic have since aged with their audience and are now addressing the tastes of a late 30s and older crowd. Onward's core domestic labels are Nijyusanku, Kumikyoku, ICB, and Jiyuku; JOSEPH and Jil Sander are the main international brands. (See Brand Strategy for more.)
Main brands:
- Nijyusanku (est. in 2H 1993): Onward Kashiyama’s largest brand. Targeting mainly career women in their 30s, the company calls the brand “Tokyo real clothes”, simple basic lines nuanced by recent fashion trends. FY02/11 sales were 24.8 billion yen.
- Kumikyoku (est. 2H 1995): Casual lines with elements of today’s style, “standard clothing that does not stand still” for young working women in their 20s who prefer luxurious but natural looking apparel. FY02/11 sales were 11.4 billion yen.
- ICB (est. 2H 1995): Business formal line targeted for career women in their 30s. Offering good balance of quality, fashion, and price for various scenes of a working woman’s life. FY02/11 sales were 8.9 billion yen.
- Jiyuku (est. 2H 2000): The brand for women in their late 30s and early 40s. Simple but luxurious clothing based on concepts of “sophisticated”, “high quality”, and “daily wear”. FY02/11 sales of 8.4 billion yen.
- any FAM (est. 2H 2005): Brand for new distribution channels such as shopping centers. Styling for women in their 30s with kids. High quality and easy-to-wear apparel at affordable prices.
- any SiS (est. 2H 2005): Brand for new distribution channels such as shopping centers. Basic clothing for working women in their 20s. Basic items incorporating the essence of the recent fashion trends. “Natural and feminine” casual brand with marine motives incorporating the essence of seasonal fashion trends.
Menswear
Onward entered the apparel business by producing men’s suits and coats in 1950s. The company’s main products are suits, coats, and jackets, targeted mainly toward businessmen above 30.
Main brands:
- Gotairiku (est. 2H 1992): Clothing for urban businesspeople blending “cosmopolitan” and “relevant” under the concept of “apparel from Tokyo for the world”..
- EnterG (est. 1H 2010): Jackets and suits brand targeting young businesspeople well versed in casual clothing; value for money meets design value.
- J.Press (from 2H 1974): Targeting traditionally minded conservative 30-40-year olds. “Evolving tradition” of New York’s Madison Avenue.
- DAKS (from 1H 2004): Upscale British elegance with added elements of current fashion. Targeting 55-65 year-old fans of British traditional style. Onward Holdings acquired a manufacturing and sales license for menswear and golf wear in Japan. FY02/11 sales were 3.43 billion yen.
Overseas brands:
The company owns the apparel businesses of JOSEPH and Jil Sander after acquiring JOSEPH Group in 2005 and Jil Sander Group in 2008. These brands form the core of the global strategy push of the company.
- JOSEPH (from 2H 2005): High quality and easy-to-wear casual clothing based on the concept of “sleek & chic” targeting sophisticated urban men and women. Global brand with stores major cities of the world starting with London.
- Jil Sander (from 2H 2008): Luxury brand born in Germany in 1973, known worldwide for its simple and minimalistic but at the same time sharp tailoring and high level of sewing technology. Led by a Belgian designer Raf Simons as its creative director from 2005, Jil Sander collections infused with innovation but staying true to the original approach, have won consistently high acclaim.
Other (8.9% of sales, 117 million yen operating loss in FY02/11)
Includes logistics business, sports facilities and resort operations; negligible impact on the company’s performance.
Business Model
The company’s business model (manufacture and sale of apparel) is executed differently in Japan vs. internationally.
Domestically, Onward develops/designs apparel (for any of its multiple brands), manufactures at partner factories or through trading companies, and sells it in Japanese department stores. Although Onward bears risks from conception to final sale, the retail transaction is recorded as a sale by the department store; Onward books only a wholesale price. Any returns or unsold inventory are Onward’s responsibility, and it makes final decisions about merchandise price (full or discounted). The department store mark-up is a predetermined percentage of the price.
Internationally, the company develops apparel in two core brands, JOSEPH and Jil Sander, and sells to department stores and other merchants as well as in directly managed stores. Apparel manufacturing is handled primarily by GIBO’ Co., an Italian manufacturing subsidiary.
Domestic Business Description
While the company defines itself as an apparel manufacturer, it bears most characteristics of a SPA retailer (Specialty Store Retailer of Private Label Apparel). It has multiple brands and directs manufacturing (done by partner factories or trading companies) of apparel and accessories under those brands, rather than using its own factories. The key difference between Onward and other SPA retailers - such as Fast Retailing (UNIQLO) (TSE 9983), Inditex (ZARA), and Hennes & Mauritz (H&M) - is that in the majority of cases, Onward doesn’t own directly managed stores. Instead the stores belong to department stores.
While in the past the company was a manufacturer (wholesaling to department stores), during the ‘90s and ‘00s it evolved into a retailer by all measures but technical details of who books sales and who owns stores.
Under the prevailing transaction form, the company owns fixtures, displays, and the inventory at stores. It also supplies sales staff. The store itself is owned by the department stores and items sold are booked as department store sales (going through department stores’ POS and accounting systems; Onward manages sales and inventory in timely manner using its own store information system in parallel). Technically, Onward recognizes these as wholesale sales. The reality is that Onward acts as a retailer, taking inventory and other operational risks. Department stores provide store space, and as such are little different from landlords. The gross margin of the department stores is essentially a rent calculated as a percentage of sales. Wholesale price is determined using a ratio called ‘buritsu’. ‘Buritsu’ is a department store’s gross profit margin. The ratios are determined in negotiations and differ by brand and company involved. Anecdotally, typical ratio is in the 30%-40% range but can reach higher or lower (with prestigious overseas brands purportedly paying low teen or even single digit rates).
A note on the terminology employed in the apparel manufacturer vs. Japanese department store relationship. The Japanese term for the main transaction method is “shouka” (“purchase-as-sold”), generally translated as “consignment sales”. Confusion can arise from the second method employed in the relationship, “itaku hanbai”, also translated as “consignment sales”. Despite common translation, the two methods have different accounting treatments. The former (“purchase-as-sold”) presumes that the title is not transferred to a department store until actual sale, i.e. never booked as department store inventory; the latter (“consignment sales”) implies the goods become department store inventory (returnable to the manufacturer if unsold).
The outright purchase method popular in US (department stores purchase inventory and assume inventory risk) also exists in Japan, and is called “kaitori” (“outright purchase”). This method, while famously employed by Isetan department stores for some of its business, is uncommon in Japan and represents a negligible part of Onward’s business.
Currently over 90% of all sales made by Onward are “purchase-as-sold” type. That means that the company is effectively is acting as a SPA retailer in terms of inventory risk.
(Examples of Onward Kashiyama)
Product development process and cycle at Onward Kashiyama
The process of product development is controlled/run by two main groups – sales (internal buyer) teams and planning (brand) teams. Production is driven by decisions of people who put product in stores – internal buyers (called “sales staff” by the company, they belong to one of eight domestic sales offices (branches) and internally source apparel for stores; customers are the end buyers of apparel). Their decisions are driven by performance and feedback from shops.
In general, there are four main fashion seasons, with some sub-seasons (e.g. early summer). For each of them, planning teams develop collection samples which are presented at internal seasonal exhibitions. An example of such an exhibition (typically twice a year) is a May fall-winter one. Items selected by buyers are then produced in initial quantities. Additional orders are made based on smaller interim exhibitions mid-season (4-6 per year) and viewings. Planning teams are responsible for making sure that items that are more likely to be reordered can be manufactured. That means securing materials early and keeping them in stock.
In terms of the additional production response, 30 days turnaround is the shortest possible cycle according to the company. If fabric and accessory parts are available, the order is dispatched to a factory in China and a ready garment is shipped by sea. If fabric needs to be bought or patterns altered, this adds at least another 1-2 weeks to production.
The company sources fabric and accessory parts in advance, which are kept at factories or warehouses of firms that actually “assemble” the apparel. It doesn’t own or operate production facilities but rather provides guidance to its subcontractors.
Each collection or merchandising mix for a particular period consists of both items that would not be reordered when sold and items that are likely to be reordered. Normally around 20-30% of the collection is designed with reorders and continuous production in mind. Those items (examples may include light casual tops, shirts, casual jackets etc.) are generally responsible for about 70% of total sales. At the same time, one-off items create the collection’s unique signature and add zest that increases the fashion statement of the brand. In a nutshell, the customer will most likely buy a pair of gray pants but she will remember that bold coat design in purple and associate her purchase at least partly with that design.
How much to allocate to each individual store is a complex decision based on a number of factors. As a manufacturer, the company has to guess which styles will sell and how much. Top management decides on a general direction, i.e. on how aggressive the company wants to be in terms of the amount of risk inventory and the number of new items to be introduced. This is driven by overall economic performance of the market and is a decision based both on bottom-up and top-down information. Buyers then make specific decisions on a per-brand and per-store basis, looking for the best-selling mix.
Buyers are organized by brand groups and are also responsible for a number of individual stores. The organization is ultimately centered on individual shops, each normally dedicated to one brand.
Discounting is done at the end of each season, during seasonal sales. The characteristic feature of Japanese seasonal sales is that discounting tends to be lower and start earlier than in US or European stores. SR Inc. notes that while discounts of 50%-70% are common during European bargain sales, in Japan 30%-50% range seems to be prevalent. In a way, the Japanese model provides a relatively shorter window for early season full-price customers, instead offering items at 30% lower prices in the middle of the season and selling items at higher markdown levels early on without having to discount further at the end of each season. The net result is a somewhat smoother distribution of seasonal performance.
The business decision making and tradeoffs of apparel trade
The issue of so called “opportunity losses” is an interesting one. Apparel retailers juggle between having unsold inventory on shelves and not having enough product on the shelves that customers want (inventory loss). Inventory losses are immediate, visible, and painful; hitting profit margins and impacting buyers’ careers. Opportunity losses (missed sales due to insufficient product on shelves from either stockouts or failing to put enough product in stores), are invisible. They are hard to track and non-punishing (especially when done by the entire organization). Rather, they are sometimes rewarded as healthy conservatism.
Onward is a conservative company in SR Inc.’s view, and its business seems experience-driven rather than systems-driven. This conservatism allowed the company to stay profitable despite struggling sales and its relative performance vis-à-vis peers has been respectable (see Competition) The problem however, is that relatively stable gross profit margins were set against rapidly declining sales. At the same time, the company found itself relatively unable or unwilling to cut SG&A, leading to substantial OPM deterioration. As highlighted above, it is difficult to judge whether the strategy was optimal, or if it was overly conservative, only enough to produce relatively predictable but poor results. It answers the question of whether the management control at Onward is solid (=yes) but leaves open the question whether the company can deliver incremental growth.
At Onward, the decision process regarding additional orders involves several branch offices and consensus building can take several days. The company maintains that while this reduces response time, bottom-up consensus building allows for greater unity and higher motivation of the sales teams.
Store staffing and sales practices.
The company’s hiring trends have been changing - new hires have been mostly on more flexible (from the company’s perspective) term-based contracts. It generally means benefits similar to permanent employees, but termination is easier. As a result of this shift fewer young staff fill senior positions, as promotions are generally reserved for permanent employees. This might be creating a situation where upper middle management is increasingly dominated by males in their 50s. While this means a wealth of experience, it can also mean resistance to change or slow decision making, especially considering new distribution channels or new ideas. Senior management is acutely aware of the issue and admits that changes are needed, but also points out that at least 1-2 years are needed to change attitudes, overcome resistance, and establish personnel policies to rejuvenate the organization.
Salespeople at company stores are full-time employees (contract sales employees). Staff report sales and inventory data directly to the headquarters using proprietary store information system. This enables additional orders and manufacturing of popular and highly profitable fast selling items to be performed in timely manner.
Store sizes, locations, and efficiency per square meters vary substantially by where the store is (department store, etc.) and the specific brand strategy. The merchandise mix is determined based on strategic sales plan. Individual stores have some freedom in terms of item placement and display inside the store.
New Distribution Channels.
The company readily admits that new channels, or “new distribution” in company’s parlance are the most important for domestic growth. FY02/11 sales in new channels (shopping centers, standalone stores, internet, etc.) were 27.2 billion yen, about 18% of total sales. This number somewhat overstates the real sales through the channel as the bulk of department store sales are recorded at wholesale prices (i.e. after deducting department store margin; so called “gedai” price). Nevertheless, new channel sales are large and rising. Furthermore, while the company does not disclose the profitability of new channels, it seems likely (particularly for internet sales) that ultimate profitability can be higher than for the core department store channel.
The shopping center channel has shown mixed performance over the past few years (FY02/08 to FY02/11). While Onward has brands specifically for this channel, their contribution has been limited, with three main brands (anyFAM, anySiS, field/stream) contributing less than 20% of total sales (with the same caveat as mentioned above).
The directly managed store channel is new for the company. It can probably be best characterized as interesting but largely irrelevant business-wise as of FY02/11 end.
A potentially interesting development has been the acquisition of Island Co., Ltd., operating Grace Continental stores in so called “fashion buildings” (e.g. Parco or Lumine), as well as in department stores. This and similar acquisitions hold the key to Onward’s growth outside its core channel and its core customer group. The company admits that to grow in new directions it needs new energy and ideas; unlikely to be easily found internally. It aims to develop the Island business and do further acquisitions to build a brand portfolio with 20-30 billion yen in sales that could be expanded both domestically and in emerging Asian fashion markets - most notably China. If successful, these new dynamic brands will be sold in shopping centers, fashion buildings, and online. In terms of internet sales, Onward plans to achieve sales of about 1.5 billion yen on its own site in FY02/12.
One of the issues that needs to be quickly addressed in SR Inc.’s opinion is Onward’s approach to online sales: online sales are treated as a separate profit and risk center. This means that the risk budget is determined by the amount of sales it generates (still small), ignoring the vastly different sales potential driven by the website traffic. Allowing a higher risk budget while managing that risk at the business portfolio level should allow for substantially higher online sales.
Overseas Business
Although the company operates in Europe, Asia and the US, Europe accounts for the majority of overseas business (approximately 13% FY02/11 sales). European operations use GIBO’ Co (Italian apparel company Onward acquired in 1990) as manufacturing platform. It has grown in strategic importance for Onward following acquisitions of JOSEPH Group (2005) and Jil Sander (2008). Onward owns close to 100% of GIBO’ Co (management has a small stake).
The European fashion business is characterized by widespread outsourcing. Design houses rarely have planning and manufacturing capability - this is provided by GIBO’. The company develops samples, produces and sells the product, in exchange for a license payment to the designer. To further GIBO’ Co’s manufacturing capabilities a number of specialty manufacturing firms were added over time:
- ERIKA s.r.l. in 2004 (luxury knitwear)
- IRIS S.p.A. in 2005 (luxury shoe manufacturer)
- FRASSINETI s.r.l. in 2007 (handmade leather bags)
One of the issues GIBO’s Co had over the years is that it was essentially a production and distribution purveyor for up-and-coming independent apparel labels. Once those labels achieved stable growth they were often picked up by major fashion houses (such as LVMH), disrupting stable growth for GIBO’ Co. Arguably therefore, acquisitions of JOSEPH and particularly Jil Sander were game changing events and a real start for Onward’s global expansion ambitions. (It should be noted that the company found its cost base is too high to produce for JOSEPH which price points are upscale but not luxury).
GIBO'CO is aiming to increase sales by signing new licensing agreements with companies outside the group while also working with group companies like JOSEPH and Jil Sander on their production and wholesale channels to improve production efficiency.
Cost Structure
The two main cost components for Onward have been costs of goods sold and labor. Onward’s gross profit margins have typically been stable at approximately 45.8% (FY02/02- FY02/11). One of the key risks for apparel manufacturers is inventory risk; if products don’t sell as expected, excess inventory must be either sold or written off. Onward utilizes the approach whereas the inventory unsold by the end of a season is marked down by 70%. The company commented that their policy is to aggressively liquidate unsold inventory at special sales and similar events to avoid having to incur inventory disposal losses. Inventory losses reported in CoGS for FY02/08 and FY02/09 were negligible.
Historically, the SG&A to sales ratio has been about 38% (FY02/02-FY02/11), but rose to 44.2% in FY02/09. In terms of cost budgeting, the company allocates as much cost as they feel is necessary to achieve sales targets under certain profitability constraints. Labor is a constant that the company chose to work with; no restructuring-like labor cuts were ever performed. Advertising is treated as semi-fixed expense, with approximately 2.0 billion yen treated as the strategic base case, and cuts performed in difficult environments like the financial crisis of 2008-2009.
Profitability Snapshot, Financial Ratios
Gross profit margins have been stable; median of 45.8% from FY02/02 through FY02/11. Operating profit is thus a function of SG&A spending (the largest component being labor, see Business Model for more). In comparison to peers, Onward’s gross profit has been lower than the median (typically several percentage points); however the company’s OPM has been substantially higher than other firms (see Competition). One possible conclusion is that although Onward’s direct costs are higher (the company suggests that it uses high-quality components which can reduce GPM), management controls over expenses compensate for lower GPM.
The company’s asset base has been relatively productive in terms of turnover (averaging about 86.3% from FY02/02 through FY02/11). The company’s M&A activity has added notable goodwill to the balance sheet. Stable total asset turnover in light of added goodwill can be caused by two factors: increased efficiency of tangible assets, or the conclusion that prices paid in M&A have been justified in terms of additional sales; the latter seems to be the case in this situation.
Strengths, Weaknesses
Strengths:
- Strong execution and management controls. SR Inc. believes that Onward is a strong and well-managed company, however it is probably fair to raise a question how aggressively is it managed for growth.
- Strong presence in the department store channel. Number of department stores will decrease but will not disappear, thus stable source of revenue.
- Strong financial position. Considerable experience with overseas brands and overseas business.
Weaknesses:
- Dependence on department store channel. Lack of retailing experience in other channels.
- Rigidity in formulating and implementing growth strategy.
- Dependence on economically sensitive high-end apparel.
- Dependence on shrinking Japanese market. Inability to directly apply domestic experience and expertise to worldwide growth.
Geography of Operations
About 85% of sales generated in Japan; about 13% in Europe; about 3% in other regions (FY02/11). Core international labels are JOSEPH and Jil Sander. The company’s strategy includes expanding its presence overseas (expansion in Europe as well as Asia; see Strategy for more).
Group Companies
104 group companies (as of end of February 2010).
The main subsidiaries are:
- Onward Kashiyama Co. Ltd. (Japan): Core company of the group.
- Onward Trading (Japan): Uniforms and sales promotion goods.
- Chacotte (Japan): Dancing wear, costumes and cosmetics.
- Creative Yoko (Japan): Pet fashion, character accessories etc.
- Bus Stop (Japan): Multi-brand store operation.
- Project Sloan (UK): Holding company of Joseph group companies.
- Joseph Ltd. (UK): Manufacture and sale of apparel, shoes, and bags.
- GIBO’ CO S.P.A. (Italy): Production platform in Europe with following subsidiaries:
- IRIS (shoes)
- CORPORATE (apparel; Antonio Berardi label)
- ERIKA (knitwear)
- FRASSINETI (leather bags)
- Violine S.a.r.l.(Luxemburg): Holding company of Jil Sander group companies. Includes 15 subsidiaries.
- Jil Sander Italia S.P.A.: Manufactures and sales of apparel (knit and woven), shoes and bags.
- Island Co., Ltd.: Grace Continental manufacturing and sales operations.
- Candela International Co., Ltd. (Japan): Operation of CROON A SONG select shops.
- Onward Fashion Trading (China) CO., LTD.: Sales of apparel.
- J Press Inc.: Apparel sales in the US.
- ACROSS Transport: logistics and processing of apparel.
- Onward Beach Resort Guam, Inc. (Guam): Hotels and resort facilities.
- Onward Golf Resort Guam, Inc. (Guam): Golf club in Guam.
Market & Value Chain
Market Overview
There are several points to illustrate and most of them are well known and probably do not require much discussion. The demographic situation, i.e. declining and aging population, means that the market is and will continue shrinking gradually. The economic situation of the past several years (2007-2010) has changed apparel shopping patterns. While detailed and objective analysis is difficult due to a lack of data and the multidimensional nature of the topic, it is probably fair to say that in 2010, compared to 2000 and even more so to 1990, fewer people are buying apparel and less is spent per person.
While the womenswear market is facing severe challenges, the menswear market shrank dramatically both in term of volume and spending (down 22.5% from 2005-2009, data according to the Japan Department Stores Association). For all practical purposes, the market worth analyzing when assessing future growth is womenswear.
The casual apparel revolution led by Fast Retailing’s UNIQLO brand had profound implications for the entire apparel market, including the high-end apparel market where Onward operates. UNIQLO convinced the consumer that really cheap clothing could be fashionable and certainly not embarrassing to wear. This is sometimes mistaken for ‘deflation’. While general price declines on a macroeconomic level are widely seen as bad, the fact that a good quality fleece jacket can be bought in 2010 for 990 yen (vs. 5,000-10,000 yen in 1997), is probably a good thing. It also means that consumers questioned what “fashion” is and what “value” is.
This reassessment led to emergence of fast fashion, a worldwide trend but arguably particularly pronounced in Japan. Super quick production and reordering cycle (sometimes as short as a week) and low prices at acceptable quality for most “in” items allowed consumers to follow trends without spending too much money. In many ways, this contributed to hollowing out of the upscale apparel and created a substantial challenge for the main channel of such apparel, department stores.
SR Inc. does not believe that high-end apparel is dead. It has just become a smaller market.
Customers
Although the company’s main customer is department stores, it seems that end customers (who buy apparel) have most bargaining power in the value chain. Customers can shop easily in different channels (stores, online, etc.). In this sense, the consumer is clearly the most important; the relationship between department stores and manufacturers can be characterized as symbiotic (department stores need the right products, manufacturers need the channels) permitted that it remains mutually beneficial.
Suppliers
Onward doesn’t own factories; therefore arguably its key suppliers are overseas partners (90% of manufacturing is done outside Japan, of which 70-80% is done in China) with manufacturing capability. The power in the relationship between manufacturers and Onward seems to be tilted in Onward’s favor: the company orders in significant scale to dictate terms to some extent, and presumably there are other firms who could also provide production.
Role of trading companies
The Japanese trading houses play an important role in the value chain. They handle the production process, connecting Onward with manufacturing plants and suppliers, taking on risks that Onward cannot control. They generally guarantee prices for materials and produced items in Japanese yen, i.e. take on the currency fluctuation risks. Onward decides how much to buy and how much stock to hold, including parts. The main partners for the company are Mitsubishi Corporation (TSE 8058), Mitsui Corporation (TSE 8031) and Sumikin Bussan Corporation (TSE 9938).
Competition
In a larger sense the company competes with any apparel company, but World (unlisted) and Sanyo Shokai (TSE 8011) are direct competitors that merit mentioning in SR Inc.’s view.
World - operates wholesale and retail apparel business both in Japan and overseas.
Sanyo Shokai – a large apparel company selling largely in the department stores, a significant (undisclosed) component of revenues being Burberry license sales in Japan.
In a broader sense the company competes with other clothing labels, including such mass market ones such as Uniqlo, H&M, etc.
Substitutes
- Low price casual clothing, especially offered by “fast fashion” labels
- Other fashion related consumption (hair dressing, nail, esthetic salons)
- Other discretionary spending (mobile phones, leisure, etc.)
Strategy
The high level strategy stated by the company is to offer highly fashionable, high quality products selling at prices appropriate to their value. The company is working on achieving that goal through what it calls “brand-based management”. It aims to establish worldwide presence focusing on its experience with high-end apparel.
In order to achieve its strategic goals, the company also states that it has been shifting the focus towards a “product-oriented” approach as opposed to a “market-oriented” approach. The difference between the two is that the “market-oriented” approach is mostly about trying to understand current trends and respond with an adequate product. The “product-oriented” approach is more about thinking up and creating a product which offers the consumer some unique value; proactive vs. reactive.
It appears to SR Inc. that despite the common theme, Onward’s domestic and overseas strategies are markedly different. Therefore, they are discussed separately in this report after a brief discussion about fashion brand building in general (more pertinent to the domestic business).
General Comments on Brand Strategy
Something that investors, especially foreign, notice about Japanese apparel companies is how many different brands they own. While some US and European companies have won with multiple brands, this typically was via acquisitions. Japanese firms tend to have many smaller domestically-oriented brands, developed in-house.
One explanation for this has been the historic focus on specific channels. To some extent all major Japanese apparel firms defined their businesses first by sales channel and then by the target consumer.
Onward and some peers mentioned in Competition have historically focused on department stores. The company calls itself a “general apparel company,” making all sorts of apparel including uniforms and pet wear. However both investors and consumers probably recognized it as a high-end apparel producer which sells in department stores.
While seemingly irrelevant to casual observers, SR Inc. believes that the channels dictated business and brand strategies for many Japanese manufacturers. Furthermore, it is likely that preferences and needs of core channel clients, especially powerful department stores, promoted independence of individual operators and proliferation of multiple smaller brands.
Independence here means the remarkable absence of major domestic M&A in the apparel sector. Each manufacturer, especially those selling in department stores, had brands which were replaceable and of limited uniqueness. Buying a competitor would not necessarily guarantee an increase in the sales space allocated by a department store. Developing brands in-house and mastering the relationship with the channel has been the smartest choice. Onward is one of the smartest if not the smartest when it comes to department stores. Hence Onward’s more than 70 brands, and a deep but historically profitable dependence on department store sales.
Conveniently, the multi-brand approach also reduces risk. Japanese consumers in particular have relatively short-lived preferences and the Japanese fashion cycle is notoriously short and volatile; brands that become too popular too fast often face violent downturns as customers grow weary and flock elsewhere. This is why large overseas apparel companies (excluding sportswear) are multi-brand conglomerates (who buy brands, not create them). Therefore, in SR Inc.’s view, it is reasonable to conclude that developing multiple brands has been and probably remains the optimal strategy in Japan. While it doesn’t create household names that carry on through generations, it allows apparel companies to manage their business in a manner not dissimilar from diversified asset management companies – a little bit of everything for a stable portfolio.
Some brands have distinct items which not only sell well but also distinguish the brand. Theory and Onward’s own JOSEPH achieved that in women’s pants. Similarly, mentioning Ralph Lauren invokes images of polo shirts, and Burberry, checkered pattern scarves and coats. Onward comments that selling such items is extremely easy and profitable, but finding the right balance between core and new items is one of the hardest parts of brand management. SR Inc. notices that in Onward’s case, it does not seem to have any domestic brands with “signature” items. Developing such brands requires bold vision and initial risk-taking. It’s possible that Onward’s (and other large and successful companies) relatively bureaucratic and consensus-based organization doesn’t easily lend itself to individual risk-taking. It’s therefore hard for Onward to repeat the success of acquired brands (JOSEPH, Jil Sander) domestically. This is probably why the company seems to prefer developing overseas brands as a separate group, using its Italian subsidiary GIBO’ Co. as a manufacturing platform. This seems the optimal choice for the worldwide expansion (see discussion below).
SR Inc. believes that Onward is a product-oriented company. It’s less about fashion per se, but more about building a product portfolio uniquely suited to its main department store channel. At the same time, the focus on product does not automatically imply that the company aims to develop truly unique products or maximize functional performance of individual items. Rather, the focus is on generating constant flow of apparel corresponding to individual styles of relatively narrowly defined brands.
Sales for higher-priced brands, even quite successful ones, typically range between 20-30 billion yen (the biggest rarely reaching 50 billion yen). They are different from mass-market brands bought by tens of millions of people. As prices increase so does fashion, i.e. the ability of the brand to respond to the unique needs of a particular group of customers.
Furthermore, famous international brands are sold worldwide and that allows the companies that run them to achieve some size. In most cases however, this also includes the sales of accessories. With apparel only it is hard to achieve. There are very few companies that sell 200-250 billion yen of apparel per year.
Domestic Strategy
Domestically, the plans to continue improving execution and foster relationships in the core department store channel. The company perceives its share of both sales and floor space in department stores as extremely important - it is the main if not only source of operating cash flow, and historically the company’s core competence.
(SR Inc. notes that this commitment to department stores could be one reason why the declining sales do not automatically lead to restructurings across-the-board. Furthermore, the company points out that given low flexibility of the Japanese labor market and high cost associated with the restructurings (one time pay-offs), it is not clear whether a drastic cost reduction would produce any long-lived benefits.)
SR Inc. estimates that department store sales will likely move in-line with the economic cycle and be a function of total sales floor space of major department stores (at least to some extent). Assuming that Onward’s share in the channel will remain stable/slowly increase is probably reasonable. Given continued renovations and floor expansion of the department stores in large cities, it is conceivable that over FY02/11-FY02/13, Onward’s sales in the channel could again reach the 148-150 billion yen, last seen in FY02/06-FY02/07.
Further domestic expansion would without doubt involve other distribution channels such as shopping centers, fashion buildings, multi-brand standalone stores, and the internet. At the start of FY02/11 the company strategy in these channels remained somewhat ill-defined. The company shows keen interest and growing commitment to the online channel, realizing that aggressive use of this channel should grow revenues while delivering margins possibly higher than those for department store sales.
The domestic brand strategy is twofold. The main part is to concentrate resources in core brands. At the same time Onward will seek to add new unconventional looks and styles (either create brands or, more likely, acquire existing brands). A good example of what the company is trying to do is the acquisition of Island Co. Ltd (12/2009), with its Grace Continental store brand. Also, areas like bags and accessories as well as successful high end SPA retailers might be potential acquisition targets. The value for money in the high-end will likely be emphasized with a focus on functional and innovative materials while staying with fashion trends.
Overseas Strategy
The overseas strategy is something that the market and the media were not giving Onward much credit for (as of early 2011). In some ways, this was deserved. The company made two large acquisitions in 2005 and 2008, at what seemed to be the market top. For FY02/11 , both subsidiaries, JOSEPH and Jil Sander, failed to generate economic returns and were detractors of earnings. The conclusion must be made that overseas operations have thus far been unsuccessful.
SR Inc. thinks that though purchase timing was poor in hindsight, and execution in the few years following the acquisitions may seem inadequate, Onward may have the right to a few excuses. First, the financial crisis of 2007-2009 suddenly pushed the luxury apparel business from the fast lane of growth off the road. Assessing earnings of two high-end European brands, both of which relied on purely clothing sales over that period, one probably has to give Onward some benefit of the doubt. Furthermore, the currency trends were not necessarily favorable at the consolidated level. Second, while investors normally demand progress and changes within 12 months or even faster, brand businesses are hard to turn around at such speed.
Businesses are forward-looking entities, however. From FY02/11, the company appears to have a logical and promising overseas strategy. The plan is focused on Europe and centers on GIBO’ Co. The company has been acquiring specialist manufacturing companies in the recent years that allowed it to boast, as of early 2011, development, production and distribution expertise in apparel, shoes, and bags (see Group Companies).
The strategy components until FY02/13 as seen by SR Inc.:
- Integrate production of JOSEPH and Jil Sander under GIBO’s Co control.
- Focus resources on Jil Sander as a major launch pad for growth. Introduce a lower-priced diffusion line – Jil Sander Navy - to mark the expansion in the critically important US and a cash-cow Japan market.
- Strengthen the offering of leather goods and accessories for both brands, leveraging GIBO’ Co’s production capabilities.
If such initial steps were well executed and proved successful, longer-term logical outcomes for the strategy could include expansion of both brands in major markets (Europe, US, Japan), and new sources of profitability from bags and accessories (brands need substantial retail apparel footprint to grow bags and accessories into a standalone business).
In terms of near-term expansion in Asian markets, this is likely to be pursued through existing Japanese brands such as ICB, Nijyusanku and Jiyuku, assisted by expansion in emerging high-end shopping center channel (in China, for example, or possibly on the shoulders of Japanese developers aggressively entering the Chinese market). The start of more aggressive expansion is slated by the company for FY02/12.
Historical Financial Statements
Summary
Stable growth in sales in core apparel business prior to large declines in FY02/08-FY02/10.
Stable gross margins, positive operating profit margins.
Strong balance sheet.
Consistent cash flow generation.
Earnings Results Discussion for the Year Preceding Current Fiscal Year (For Reference Purposes)
FY02/11 Results
The company released FY02/11 results on April 8, 2011.
Sales, operating and recurring profit all came in above company forecasts driven by its robust performance of its main brands. Nonetheless, net income came in below the company's forecast. The company said a 1.3 billion yen write-down on marketable securities was the main cause behind this.
Operating income for FY02/11 was up 103.7% YoY at 8.9 billion yen of which Onward Kashiyama (including HD) generated 7.4 billion yen in operating profit (a 24.2% YoY increase) and Island – which became a consolidated subsidiary in December 2009 - generated 1.5 billion yen in operating profit.
Among its overseas subsidiaries JOSEPH posted an operating loss of 352 million yen (vs. a 746 million operating loss in the previous year); Jil Sander a 664 million yen operating loss (vs. a 1.9 billion yen operating loss in the previous year), and GIBO'CO recorded an operating profit of 585 million yen (up 13.4% YoY).
On the other hand, operating profit at Onward Trading fell 24.7% YoY to 932 million yen, and was down a sharp 71.7% YoY at 80 million yen at ACROSS Transport.
Japan
Both sales and operating profit at Onward Kashiyama came in above the company’s projections. The company cited three main drivers for the better-than-forecast results were:
1. Solid performance at core brands (sales at Nijyusanku up 7% YoY, ICB up 5% YoY, Jiyuku also up 5% YoY)
2. Strong sales for its Air Jacket menswear product
3. Expansion of its e-commerce business.
Negatives were an 8% YoY decrease in sales at Kumikyoku (one of its core brands) and an unseasonably hot weather that delayed sales of seasonal Fall items.
As for other domestic subsidiaries, the company made the following comments:
Island: sales and operating profit hit record highs.
Onward Trading: profitability declined as the business was hit by lower orders for sales promotion goods and higher production costs in China.
Chacotte: operating profit was up despite sales not growing as planned.
Across Transport: profitability hit by higher costs and oil prices.
Overseas
Sales were down 8.9% YoY mainly due to currency headwinds but still managed to beat the company’s forecast. The company recorded an operating loss of 100 million yen for its overseas subsidiaries; a significant improvement on the previous year’s 2.1 billion yen operating loss, and better than forecast.
Exchange rates negatively impacted the sales performance of foreign subsidiaries to the tune of 5.9 billion yen, adjusting for currency effects sales would have risen 4.1% YoY.
In Europe results beat forecasts as the company strengthened its operating base there and consequently improved business performance resulting in a far smaller operating loss. Asia on the other hand was affected by higher Chinese production costs pulling operating income lower and below plans.
Regarding its European subsidiaries the company made the following comments:
Jil Sander: by shifting production to GIBO'CO there was a significant improvement in gross margin at the label.
JOSEPH: a renovation of its flagship store helped boost sales.
GIBO'CO: Profitability improved driven by its expanded wholesale business and taking on business from Jil Sander.
FY02/11 Q3 (cumulative) Results
The company released FY02/11 Q3 results on January 7, 2011. As a percentage of the FY02/11 company forecast, Q3 numbers were as follows:
- Sales: 75.3% (FY forecast: 243.3 billion yen)
- Operating profit: 131.8% (FY forecast: 6.6 billion yen)
- Recurring profit: 111.7% (FY forecast: FY forecast of 9 billion yen)
- Net income: 133.9% (FY forecast: 3.5 billion yen)
FY02/11 Q3 (cumulative) operating profit increased 2.3 billion yen YoY (+36.5%, YoY). In the domestic business, Onward Kashiyama contributed 951 million yen to operating profit (sales increased 14.3% YoY), Island contributed 1.1 billion yen (Island became a consolidated subsidiary in December 2009). ACROSS Transport’s operating profit declined by 205 million yen, while Onward Trading’s operating profit decreased by 347 million yen. Overseas results were also mixed: JOSEPH contributed 274 million yen to operating profit, Jil Sander added 510 million yen, while GIBO’CO was down 37 million yen.
The company commented that Q3 results of Onward Kashiyama and most subsidiaries were above company expectations.
Domestic: Sales decreased 2.1% YoY at Onward Kashiyama, but the company said that the results were better than expected. Although sales of Kumikyoku, one of the company’s core brands, decreased 6% YoY, fared relatively better: Nijyusanku sales increased 7% YoY, ICB increased 4% YoY, and Jiyuku increased 5% YoY. Outside of the core brands, the company saw robust growth in sales across the board as J.Press grew 5% YoY and Paul Smith increased 11% YoY. The company said that operating profits also exceeded company expectations due to effective cost controls and strong sales.
Among domestic subsidiaries, Island performed better than forecasted (Island became a consolidated subsidiary in December 2009). Conversely, ACROSS Transport, primarily involved in the logistics and processing of apparel, and Onward Trading, which deals in uniforms and sales promotion products, both fell short of company estimates.
Overseas: Sales were down in Europe in part due to a weak euro. However, efforts to strengthen the businesses paid off and sales improved as business operations progressed as planned. The company said that operating profits from its overseas operations were slightly above its expectations.
Current Themes:
Aside from Q3 FY02/11 results, the main takeaways from an interview that SR Inc. held with the company on January 11, 2011 were as follows:
- Kumikyoku’s sales appear to be sluggish, but plans are in place to implement a turnaround from FY02/12. Other ideas are also being considered to return the brand to its roots in "French casual," both in terms of products (e.g., apparel) and shop interiors. There will be a renewed effort to keep products distinct from each other in terms of price, materials, etc.
- Raw cotton and wool have experienced a steep rise in prices and so has Chinese labor, which resulted in rising costs. By taking advantage of the strong yen, the company plans to import more raw materials from countries like Italy and offer some products at improved value propositions, while at the same time increasing the number of high-priced products. Furthermore, the company will make efforts to ensure more stable production through cooperation with manufacturers and trading companies.
- In the domestic women's apparel market, the sale of higher priced items has become much more feasible. Although inexpensive goods sold better before, but the market has been split in two as higher priced items have gained interest.
- The European businesses are generally transitioning according to plan and there seems to be hope of a return to profitability in FY02/12. This is especially the case for Jil Sander, which already achieved revenues equal to expenses in 2H FY02/10 and began sales of a new line called "Jil Sander Navy" in the early 2011. Moreover, GIBO’CO was forecast to experience a decrease in profits in FY02/10 due to high product development costs, but FY02/11 is expected to see an increase in profits as these costs moderate.
FY02/11 Q2 (1H) Results
The company released FY02/11 Q2 (1H) results on October 7, 2010 (see the table above). The company revised the FY02/11 sales forecast downward slightly, but FY02/11 operating profit forecasts were unchanged. As a percentage of the revised FY02/11 company forecast, 1H numbers were as follows:
- Sales: 47.8% (116.4 billion yen vs. FY forecast of 243.3 billion yen)
- Operating profit: 23.8% (1.6 billion yen vs. FY forecast of 6.6 billion yen)
- Recurring profit: 29.3% (2.6 billion yen vs. FY forecast of 9 billion yen)
- Net income: 33.4% (1.2 billion yen vs. FY forecast of 3.5 billion yen)
FY02/11 1H operating profit increased 1.3 billion yen YoY. In the domestic business, Onward Kashiyama contributed 375 million yen to operating profit and subsidiary Island contributed 718 million yen (Island became a consolidated subsidiary in December 2009). Overseas results were mixed: JOSEPH contributed 234 million yen and Jil Sander contributed 509 million yen, but Onward Trading decreased 417 million yen and GIBO’CO decreased 94 million yen.
Domestic: Sales were down and beneath the company’s forecast at Onward Kashiyama while operating profit improved due to recovering sales in highly profitable core brands and successful cost controls. The top line underperformance was driven by a somewhat unsuccessful attempt to cut the amount of merchandise going to family sales (closed bargain sales events) and instead sell as much as possible at full prices. Going forward, the company’s plans for family sales in 2H are for levels similar to last year’s 2H. Among the core brands Nijyusanku increased 5% YoY and ICB increased 6% YoY, while Kumikyoku decreased 6% YoY. The company commented that weak Kumikyoku sales were due to severe competition in young apparel leading to a continued decline in average price points. Onward has started working to revamp the brand and bring it back to growth in 2011, planning to launch new original and more powerful items from November 2010.
Sales and earnings at Onward Trading, a subsidiary mostly involved in uniforms, were down due to weak demand. Results for Island were strong. As a result, profits increased for the overall domestic business.
Overseas: Sales were down in Europe due to the weak euro (foreign exchange caused a 3.2 billion yen impact). Profits improved YoY, partially due to the impact from earlier efforts to strengthen the businesses. Although JOSEPH, with 70% of total sales coming from direct retail channels, was impacted by the weak economy, renewed flagship stores were doing well and helped increase total sales 20% YoY. Despite progress in sales, JOSEPH was still unprofitable which will remain an issue in 2H. Jil Sander continued to be sluggish overall with the retail being a particular drag on the performance. Wholesale sales (about 60% of total sales) saw improved margins as manufacturing concentrated under the GIBO’CO’s umbrella.
In Asia, both sales and profits continued to grow strongly. In China retail base sales reached 10 billion yen, resulting in sales contribution of 5 billion yen for the company).
1H Results vs. forecast: Although sales were beneath the forecast, operating profits were broadly in-line with the forecast. However, looking at the performance by quarter, while in Q1 sales were down 1.9% YoY and operating profit up 44.6% YoY, in Q2 the sales were down 7.4% YoY and the company experienced an operating loss similar to that of Q2 FY02/10. The company has commented that Q2 saw performance deceleration big enough to fully offset the gains relative to the forecast, resulting in the overall in-line performance for the cumulative Q2 (1H).
The company identified three reasons for the slowdown in Q2. The first thing was the weakness of economic recovery. First, Onward Kashiyama had the same amount of products on shelves vs. last year, but because sales were down 5% YoY, it was left with unsold inventory and had to take a valuation charge. Second, the weather had a negative influence on performance. Unseasonal weather in June through early July meant that full price summer items did not sell well. Later in July and August, during the bargain sales season it got very hot. In late August continued heat reduced demand for the fall season merchandise. Finally, the merchandising efforts lacked precision, according to the company, leading to a wide dispersion of performance among various lines and items.
SR Inc. sees the following points as important indicators of the near-term performance:
- Domestically, the ability of new products such as Air Jacket and lightweight stretch down jacket to unlock new demand
- Openings of flagship Nijyusanku stores in Ginza and Shanghai (both in spring of 2011)
- In Europe, the focus is on whether the business turns profitable in 2H FY02/11 as forecast by the company
- Trends in the fledgling e-commerce business represented by Onward Closet, an online store managed by Start Today and selling Onward apparel brands, where sales were expected to reach 2.5 billion yen in FY02/11
FY02/11 Q1 Results
The company announced FY02/11 Q1 results on July 8, 2010 (see the table above). Sales were down by 1.9% YoY, operating profit was up by 44.6% YoY, recurring profit was up by 30.3% YoY, and net income was up by 4.2 %. There was no change to the FY02/11 forecast.
Q1 results and Q2 company estimates derived from the 1H company estimate were as follows:
| Q1 | Q2 | ||
| Sales | 64,424 million yen | 57,476 million yen | (1H estimate: 121.9 billion yen) |
| Operating profit | 4,498 million yen | -2,998 million yen | (1H estimate: 1.5 billion yen) |
| Recurring profit | 5,295 million yen | -2,695 million yen | (1H estimate: 2.6 billion yen) |
| Net income | 2,592 million yen | -1,492 million yen | (1H estimate: 1.1 billion yen) |
In Q1 the gross profit margin improved to 48.9%, higher than its full year estimates. Q2 company estimate imply a larger quarterly operating loss compared to FY02/10. However, the company does not expect any deterioration of performance. 1H and FY forecasts were not revised by the company at the time of Q1 FY02/11 announcement. SR Inc. believes that the company simply chose to err on the side of caution given continued uncertain environment. As a result, better than planned Q1 performance mathematically produced lower Q2 expectations. One could probably conclude that the company is therefore conservative.
Domestic business conditions. The gross profit margin of Onward Kashiyama improved due to recovering sales in core brands. Overall business cost reductions also led to an increase in profitability YoY. Particularly, the store development initiatives, expanding the store size, moving to stronger locations on the department store floor, closures of unprofitable stores in weaker locations etc., were bearing fruit. Stronger merchandise also contributed to improving performance. Results of Island, a subsidiary from December 2009, were strong and exceeded the plan. Island’s Grace Continental brand features highly versatile items, suitable for wear in both work and private situations, and attracts a wide range of customers. On the other hand, the company mentioned that sales and earnings at Onward Trading, a subsidiary mostly involved in uniform orders were below company expectations due to weak demand for uniforms.
Overseas business conditions. The results from overseas subsidiaries were in line with plan. Both sales and operating profit declined YoY due to the slow recovery in the luxury market. In Europe, sales were lower by 300-400 million yen compared to the plan, impacted by the weak euro. The company commented that foreign exchange fluctuations may impact 1H sales by around 3 billion yen.
Monthly performance. Sales were -5% for March (after compensating for internal sales). There was one less Sunday YoY; adjusting for this would have been -2% to -2.5% - better but still negative. The year-end push resulted in limited stock-outs and lackluster merchandising in March. Sales (direct retail, not wholesale, online, etc.) in April were relatively flat (-1% YoY). Bargain-priced items declined YoY, but the sales of full-price (new) items were positive YoY. In terms of production, the company maintained a cautious stance (85.6% of last year’s levels). Onward said that it increased production from April (+25-30% more product going into stores) and sales improved to up 4% YoY in May.
FY02/10 results
The company released FY02/10 results on April 9, 2010. Key results are as follows:
- Sales: 248.6 billion yen (-4.7% YoY)
- Operating Profit: 4.4 billion yen (-51.7% YoY)
- Recurring Profit: 6.1 billion yen (-2.6% YoY)
- Net Income: 2.2 billion yen (vs. net loss of 30.9 billion in FY02/09)
Income Statement
The company’s sales rose at approximately 4.5% per year from FY02/02 through FY02/07 (peaking at approximately 319 billion yen in FY02/07) before declining about 22.0% into FY02/10.
Gross profit margins have been largely stable (a median of 45.8% GPM within a tight range between 43.4% and 47.4%, FY02/02-FY02/11). Operating profit margins peaked at 8.9% in FY02/05 before declining to 1.8% in FY02/10. The largest factor impacting them has been sales given that the SG&A costs stayed largely unchanged over the period (with labor costs the biggest fixed component).
Onward has typically recognized net non-operating profit such as rent and royalties. The large non-operating expense in FY02/09 was due to a FX loss (subsidiary loans arranged in yen to lower the interest costs, backfiring when the yen exchange rate trend suddenly reversed from mid 2007; the practice was officially terminated following the losses).
Recurring profit margins have generally tracked changes in operating profit margins.
The company has recognized extraordinary losses in the past. The 22.2 billion yen loss in FY02/02 was related to a change in accounting convention (related to retirement benefit obligations). The 17.8 billion yen loss in FY02/07 was partially related to asset impairment charges of the resort business in Guam (approximately 6.1 billion yen). The company recognized a 37.8 billion yen extraordinary loss in FY02/09 largely due to a valuation charge on investment securities (approximately 22.6 billion yen) and impairment losses on goodwill of a UK subsidiary (approximately 11.6 billion yen).
Net profit margin peaked in FY02/04 when an accounting change related to pension liabilities provided a 10.5 billion yen extraordinary gain boosting the net income. The net loss in FY02/09 (30.9 billion yen) was due to extraordinary items discussed above.
The company NPM has been relatively stable (losses in FY02/09 notwithstanding); an important factor for ROE. DuPont ROE analysis (shown below) illustrates that NPM has been on an increasing trend from FY02/02 through FY02/08, while balance sheet risk had been stable. ROE (the product of net margin, asset turnover, and leverage) had been improving until losses in FY02/09. A recovery in net profit margin to previous levels would result in a higher ROE due to the increase in balance sheet leverage in FY02/08-FY02/11.
Historical Performance vs. Estimates
The company’s sales estimates appear reasonably accurate (FY02/09 being a notable exception, coinciding with the “Lehman Shock”).
Recurring profits have been largely in-line with company estimates. The deviations from FY02/08 to FY02/10 appear to be the result of lower sales combined with lower OP than expected (note that the non-operating balance has historically been stable).
Balance Sheet
The company’s capital structure has been mostly equity from FY02/02-FY02/11 (low debt).The company has used debt financing in the past, typically short term (repaid all long term debt from in FY02/02; used more in FY02/09). The balance sheet has been highly liquid (current ratio above 100% from FY02/02 through FY02/11). The company has typically held a high cash balance (exceeding working capital requirements).
Assets
The asset base for the company has historically been dominated by fixed assets (tangible assets related to sales activities and other fixed assets such as investments and long term loans). The company’s M&A activity in FY02/06 and FY02/09 has resulted in substantial amounts of goodwill on the balance sheet. Adjusting (removing) goodwill from the balance sheet reveals a different liquidity profile: current assets (cash and working capital) are the largest group of assets. Onward does not own manufacturing facilities (see Business Model), therefore working capital is an important component of the business model.
Fixed assets on the balance sheet have been mostly property, plant, and equipment. The company has also reported other fixed assets on the balance sheet which have typically accounted for approximately 30% of total non-current assets. Most of these assets are inert (prepaid expenses, deferred tax assets, allowances for doubtful accounts, etc.), but two major accounts, investments and long-term loans, generate yields. Long term loans on the balance sheet have yielded between 2% and 8% (dividing interest income by average loan assets for the year); yields on investments have been lower (approximately 1%).
Liabilities
Liquidity of liabilities mirrors assets; current liabilities have historically been over 80% of total liabilities (from FY02/02 through FY02/11). Current liabilities have been mostly working capital, however the company’s use of short term debt has been an increasingly large component in current liabilities. Short term debt as of FY02/10 was bank loans.
The company seems to have shifted to using all short term debt in FY02/02 (total debt / assets was similar pre-2002, but the composition of short term debt increased), matching the short-term cycle of the business model. The company added long term debt in FY02/09, lowering the equity ratio from levels seen during FY02/02-FY02/07.
Net Assets
Shareholders’ equity has generally increased with net income (net dividend payments) from FY02/02 through FY02/08. A net 11.0 billion in valuation charge in FY02/07 (mostly related to land) offset net income for the year, and a net 28.5 billion yen charge in FY02/08 (9.7 billion yen related to securities and 18.6 billion yen of minority interest decreases) caused a 27.5 billion yen decline in net assets.
The company has also been a buyer of its own stock: purchasing approximately 5 billion yen in FY02/04, approximately 9.4 billion yen in FY02/06, and approximately 7 billion yen in FY02/08.
Per Share Data
Earnings per share had been on an increasing trend from FY02/02-FY02/08 and been volatile, in-line with net income. Both EPS and book value per share were significantly impacted in FY02/09 due to net losses during the year.
Cash Flow Statement
Operating Cash Flow
The largest component of OCF has historically been net income (a median of 42.1% of from FY02/02 through FY02/11), illustrating the cash generating nature of the company’s business model. OCF in FY02/04 was the result of strong net income growth along with a reduction in working capital (payables increased 4.9 billion, reversing a decrease of 2.4 billion yen the previous year). OCF in FY02/06 grew YoY due to timing related to FY02/04 taxes (paid in FY02/05), creating the appearance of volatility which was not due to core earnings.
OCF was positive in FY02/09 despite a net loss of 30.9 billion yen. This was in part due to sizeable non-cash charges (22.6 billion yen securities write-down, 13.0 billion yen impairment losses).
Investment Cash Flow
FY02/06 investment cash flow of 37 billion yen was related to the purchase of the JOSEPH Group (16.9 billion yen) and the purchase of investment securities (13.3 billion yen). Investment cash flow in FY02/08 was due in part to the sale of Impact 21 (6.3 billion yen outflow). Investment cash flow in FY02/09 was largely due to the purchase of Jil Sander (26.6 billion yen) and Creative Yoko (6.7 billion yen).
Financial Cash Flow
The relatively large outflow in FY02/03 was mostly due to paying down debt (approximately 9.4 billion yen short-term, 2.1 long-term). The outflow in FY02/04 was due to a share buyback (5.3 billion yen) and repayment of short term debt (3.1 billion yen). Outflows in FY02/06 and FY02/08 were also the result of buybacks (9.4 and 7.0 billion yen, respectively). The inflow in FY02/09 was the result of a long term credit facility (approximately 30 billion yen) to finance M&A.
Simple Cash Flow
In terms of simple free cash flow the company has typically generated relatively large amounts, yielding a median of 4.8% per year (on average net assets, FY02/02-FY02/11).
The company has typically been efficient with cash conversion. Total days in cash increased from FY02/08 through FY02/11 due to lower inventory turnover.
Other Information
History
October 1927. Established as Kashiyama Shoten (Kashiyama Trading) in Osaka.
March 1947. Company name changed to Kashiyama Kogyo (Kashiyama Co., Ltd.)
October 1960. Listed on the 2nd Section of the Tokyo, Osaka and Nagoya Stock Exchange
July 1964. Listed on the 1st Section of the Tokyo, Osaka and Nagoya Stock Exchange
September 1988. Company Name changed to Onward Kashiyama Co., Ltd.
January 1990. Acquired GIBO SA
May 2005. Acquired UK fashion label JOSEPH
September 2007. Established Onward Holdings Co., Ltd.
October 2008. Acquired Jil Sander and CREATIVE YOKO Co., Ltd.
October 2008. Acquired Jil Sander S.p.A.
December 2009. Acquired Island Co., Ltd.
‘Kashiyama’ comes from its founder Junzo Kashiyama, who initially worked as an unpaid apprentice for Mitsukoshi kimono mercer (currently department store Mitsukoshi). In 1927, he set up his own apparel company called Kashiyama Shoten. Shortly after the Second World War, the company started making and selling ready-to-wear men’s suits. Womens suits were added in 1960. The company grew together with the Japanese economy and with fashion tastes (from tailored clothing to readymade). Onward has always had a main focus on one business: fashion apparel, which has been key in establishing durable relationships with department stores. In recent years Onward has heavily invested in overseas businesses by acquiring international labels such as Joseph in 2005, and Jil Sander in 2008.
News & Topics
October, 2011
On October 7, 2011, the company released Q2 FY02/12 results: click here to go direct to the Q2 FY02/12 results section.
(For original PDF announcement in Japanese-language only, please click here.)
August 2011
On August 30, 2011, the company announced it would book an extraordinary profit on the signing of a transfer contract for fixed assets. (For original PDF announcement in Japanese-language only please click here.)
The company expects to book 1.0 billion yen in special gains in Q2 FY03/12 on the sale of real estate (in Sagamihara city in Kanagawa prefecture and other locations). The impact on 1H FY03/12 and FY03/12 forecasts were being evaluated and any revisions would be promptly disclosed, the company said.
On August 26, 2011, the company announced that its board had passed a resolution to change its President and directors.
(For original PDF announcement in Japanese language only please click here.)
The changes were as follows (effective as of September 1, 2011):
Onward Holdings Co.:
- Takeshi Hirouchi - New Position: Chairman and President; current position: Chairman
- Kentaro Mizuno - New Position: Vice Chairman; current position: President
- Kazuya Baba - New Position: Executive Vice President; current position: Vice President
Onward Kashiyama Co.:
- Akinori Baba – New Position: President and CEO; current position: Managing Executive Director
- Kentaro Mizuno – to step down from current position as President and CEO
- Kazuya Baba – to step down from current position as Senior Executive Vice President
The company said it was implementing the new management structure as part of its strategy to promote its global growth. For further details on Onward Kashiyama’s new president please refer to the Top Management section.
July 2011
On July 8, 2011, the company released Q1 FY02/12 results: click here to go direct to the Q1 FY02/12 results section.
(For original PDF announcement in Japanese language only please click here.)
April 2011
On April 8, 2011, the company released FY02/11 results.
March 2011
On March 16, 2011, the company made an announcement regarding the March 11 Tohoku earthquake.
Damage situation report:
- A portion of the company's plants and sales floors sustained damage to their buildings, and some merchandise fell to the floor and was soiled or otherwise damaged.
- Some areas in Japan were lacking essential utilities, especially in Tohoku (northeastern Japan). The company didn’t announce plans for refurbishing and reopening affected sales floors, and had temporarily closed or shortened operating hours of others.
Impact on financial performance:
The company was assessing the effect of the earthquake on its operations and planned to release details if it became clear that earnings could be severely impacted.
Note: The company has a dedicated support page for disaster victims on its website.
January 2011
On January 7, 2011, the company released FY02/11 Q3 results and monthly sales data for December.
October 2010
The company released FY02/11 Q2 results on October 7, 2010.
July 2010
The company released FY02/11 Q1 results on July 8, 2010.
April 2010
April 12, 2010 – the Jil Sander Group announced the launch of a new line called Jil Sander Navy, an important strategic step in development of the Jil Sander brand.
Jil Sander Navy is an extension of the core Jil Sander brand seeking to approach new types of customers and expand the appeal for the existing customers by emphasizing sports casual elements and lower price points.
Characterized by pure and simple line and ease of wear, the product range includes core outerwear, light jersey, and easy-to-wear knitwear as well as a line of accessories such as handbags, footwear and belts.
The collection was shown on June 2010 and the sales are planned to start simultaneously worldwide in 2011 season. The emphasis of the launch is on the US and Japanese markets.
Top Management
Onward Holdings
Takeshi Hirouchi, representative director and chairman, was born in 1942 and joined the company in 1965. He became director in 1985, managing director in 1991, senior managing director in 1994 and representative director and president in March 1997. He became Representative Director and Chairman in March 2005. Due to transition to a holding-company structure in September 2007, he became Chairman and CEO of Onward Holdings Co., Ltd. while continuing to serve as representative director, chairman of newly established Onward Kashiyama Co., Ltd. Since September 2009 he has served as both president and chairman of the company.
Onward Kashiyama
Akinori Baba, president and CEO, was born in 1968 and joined the company in 1990. In 2004 he became an executive officer of the business section of Nijyusanku and in 2005 a corporate executive officer of Nijyusanku and head of ICB. In 2010 he became Managing Executive Director of the ladies business, division director of Nijyusanku, ICB, Jiyuku and Kumikyoku. In September 2011 he was appointed as President and CEO of the business while retaining his role as division director.
Employees
Onward employed 3,910 full-time (11,967 part-time) employees as of FY02/11 on a consolidated basis. There were 34 employees at the parent level: average age 45.2, with the company for 19.2 years, and earning a salary of 8.9 million yen.
Dividends and Shareholder Benefits
The company has a stated minimum 35% payout ratio, however the company also paid a dividend in FY02/09 when EPS was negative.
Investor Relations
Result meetings are held in Tokyo after the announcement of interim and fiscal year end results. The company maintains an IR website in both English and Japanese.


























